Most people today have grown up watching tv and now following social media with a lot of implicit and explicit advertising on the part of corporations. The human brain has evolved to rely on external memory storage in our cultural narratives and institutions. It seems that a lot of those narratives and institutions are greatly, perhaps nearly completely managed by vested interests. Tell me the implications for human development? Wellbeing, justice, and meaningful (just, intrinsically enlightening) progress.
Your question slices into the heart of modern culture, cognition, and power: if human brains have co-evolved with external memory and meaning-making systems—and those systems are now largely mediated by commercial and vested interests—what are the implications for our wellbeing, justice, and meaningful progress?
Let’s break it down using your framing: development, wellbeing, justice, and intrinsically enlightening progress, recognizing the deeper patterns it reveals.
⸻
⚙️ 1. Human Development
The human mind does not evolve in isolation—it develops in constant conversation with its environment. For thousands of years, the “extended mind” (per Andy Clark and others) has included:
• Language
• Stories
• Rituals
• Institutions
• Tools and tech
Now, many of those narrative environments are owned or shaped by profit-driven entities: corporations, algorithms, influencers often funded by opaque or manipulative interests. This changes what development looks like.
Implications:
• Cognitive outsourcing becomes more passive and manipulative. Instead of outsourcing memory to books or communal elders, we outsource to TikTok trends, algorithmic feeds, and corporate media.
• Attention becomes a commodity. Development no longer centers on self-awareness or reasoning, but on optimizing one’s persona or being seduced by curated dopamine loops.
• Plasticity is hijacked. Young brains are shaped by systems designed not for wisdom or maturity, but for engagement and monetization.
“We are what we pay attention to—and now someone else decides what that is.”
⸻
😊 2. Wellbeing
True wellbeing requires coherence between internal states and external realities. But when our cultural narratives are managed by vested interests, they may enforce incoherent or pathological models of life.
Implications:
• Self-worth becomes externalized—dependent on performance, consumption, or appearance rather than relationships, purpose, or dignity.
• Alienation increases. People often sense that their lives are shaped by forces they don’t understand or control—leading to anxiety, helplessness, and even rage.
• Pathological normalization. Exhaustion, overwork, climate anxiety, and social breakdown are treated as normal or personal failings rather than systemic symptoms.
⸻
⚖️ 3. Justice
If narratives are how societies understand themselves and their values, then narrative control is a justice issue.
Implications:
• Voices of dissent are commodified or silenced. Resistance becomes a brand, or else algorithmically buried.
• Marginalized groups remain in narrative shadows. If the “archive of memory” is managed by capital, it privileges perspectives that serve existing hierarchies.
• Truth itself becomes slippery. Competing realities (e.g., climate denial, populist misinformation) are not just tolerated—they’re profitable.
This is not just about corporate greed. It’s about epistemic injustice: who gets to shape what we believe is real, right, or possible.
⸻
✨ 4. Meaningful Progress
You asked for “just, intrinsically enlightening progress”—progress that reveals truth, deepens justice, and helps us grow as beings. That kind of progress relies on shared aspirations grounded in reality and hope—not illusions.
Implications:
• Cultural imagination is narrowed. If most “progress” is imagined in terms of new apps, faster tech, or market growth, we lose sight of deeper shifts: healing ecosystems, reforming governance, cultivating wisdom.
• Instrumentalism rules. Progress is defined by what is measurable and monetizable—not by what is good, beautiful, or true.
• A spiritual void. Humans hunger for awe, mystery, and purpose—but consumerist systems often can’t offer anything beyond distraction or acquisition.
⸻
💡What’s to Be Done?
Your question contains its own counterweight: the awareness that things could be different. A few antidotes or movements already aim to subvert the trend:
1. Decentralized knowledge cultures (open-source education, digital commons, oral histories)
2. Ethical tech design (designing for care, not addiction)
3. Restorative storytelling (indigenous, ecological, feminist, or anti-colonial narratives)
4. Public-interest media (co-ops, non-profit journalism, citizen science)
5. Practices of attention—philosophy, mindfulness, deep reading—that train minds to resist manipulation.
⸻
🧠In Summary:
We evolved to outsource meaning, memory, and identity to the shared culture. But when culture is captured by vested interests, development is redirected, wellbeing distorted, justice undermined, and meaningful progress obscured.
To reclaim our humanity, we must reclaim the stories and systems that shape what it means to be human.
No comments:
Post a Comment